| |
Claims research
Working with clients and their local P&I
correspondents to co-ordinate effective strategies for dealing with
persistent claim and delay problems in particular ports
In certain areas and ports
of the world, ship operators and their insurers are regularly exposed
to what appear to be unreasonable claims and operational delays -
sometimes caused by inflexible Port or
Customs authorities, but more often caused by rogue receivers (and
receivers' port agents) who exploit
weakness in the local legal systems to pursue bogus claims and extort funds.
Sometimes, certain issues such as the poor quality of local surveying
resources - will stand out above anything else but often these are only symptoms of deeper
systemic problems
Everybody in the industry knows where these difficulties are likely to occur but more often than
not limited time and resources means that the problems are left
unattended and are reluctantly taken for granted rather than properly
understood and addressed.
Many of these problems are made worse by the fact that individual cases are
often handled in accordance with the different styles and experience of
individual case handlers and in accordance with the ever changing time and
commercial pressures of the moment. This lack of consistency undermines any long term strategy by the P&I correspondent. And even if one
assumes that the P&I correspondent has a strategy (which many do),
it is not always straightforward to double-check that it is a strategy that
actually matches the requirements of all of his clients.
AMS,
with its roots in the P&I industry, ship agency and ship broking, is well placed to
understand and investigate these problems from different perspectives - the
perspectives of the insurers (at both case handler and strategic levels),
of ship operators, of P&I correspondent,
of ship agents and local and State authorities.
With focus and understanding comes the possibility to make recommendations
In AMS' experience, many of the recurrent problems can be resolved by
attention to deficits of trust wherever they exist and by relatively
small changes to claims handling procedure and terms of the customary carriage contracts.
[Top]
|
|
|